Kaloya Moa Standalone BESS

BESS · Samsung C&T Renewable Energy Australia Pty Ltd · Storage - Battery

Dispatch stats Financials
Development AEMO: Publicly Announced Other - Other NEM data · 22h
—
Registered nameplate capacity — refresh AI for MW/MWh
Est. SRMC
$1.50/MWh
Key information

Capacity not yet researched — use Refresh equipment & project status (AI).

AEMO status Publicly Announced
Project status Development (AI)

Coordinates —

DUID —
Owner Samsung C&T Renewable Energy Australia Pty Ltd
Commissioned —
Expected closure —
Closure date —
Technology Storage - Battery
Fuel Other - Other
Battery OEM —
Battery platform / chemistry —
Inverter OEM —
Inverter / PCS model —
Stats window
15 Jun 2026 00:00 → 15 Jun 2026 22:15 AEST

Dispatch & revenue

15 Jun 2026 00:00 → 15 Jun 2026 22:15 AEST

No DUID specified. Open this page from the stats list or a generator profile.

Financial overview

2026 real AUD. Monetary values are CPI-adjusted to 2026 real Australian dollars. Greenfield capex uses AEMO benchmarks when plant-specific cost is unknown.
Type
Battery (BESS)
Capacity
—
Revenue (× MLF) (stats)
See dispatch stats link above
Est. SRMC
$1.50/MWh
Capex total (greenfield)
—
Capex refurbishment
—
Capex / MWh storage
$369,198

Shown in table
$369.2k (2026 real AUD)

Reported / source value
$350.0k (2024 nominal)
Adjusted to 2026 real AUD using Australian CPI (All Groups).
Fixed OPEX (annual)
—
Fixed OPEX / MW-yr default
$25,000

Shown in table
$25.0k (2026 real AUD)
Variable OPEX / MWh default
$1.50

Shown in table
$1.50 (2026 real AUD)
Fuel cost / GJ
—
Heat rate GJ/MWh
—

Confidence: low · Status: ai estimated · Capex basis: default · AI checked 09 Jun 2026

Notes
I could not verify a project-specific greenfield capex, commissioning date, capacity, or operating assumptions from authoritative sources. The only directly relevant indexed result confirms the asset name and owner but not cost or technical parameters. No reliable source-backed capex figure was found, so no estimate was inserted. Capacity is shown in the indexed listing as 139/400 MW, but I did not rely on it as a verified source for financial assumptions.

Sources