Callide Energy Hub - KCI

BESS · CSE BESS P/L · Storage - Battery

Development AEMO: Publicly Announced Other - Other NEM data · 7 days
200 MW
Researched capacity
Est. SRMC
$1.50/MWh
Key information
Capacity (AI)
200 MW

AEMO spreadsheet lists 200 MW for Callide Energy Hub - KCI; no reliable public project announcement with MWh capacity was found in the provided results.

AEMO status Publicly Announced
Project status Development (AI)

No project-specific public source was returned in the provided search results; inferred from AEMO 'Publicly Announced' status and lack of evidence of construction/commissioning.

Coordinates

DUID
Owner CSE BESS P/L
Commissioned
Expected closure
Closure date
Technology Storage - Battery
Fuel Other - Other
Battery OEM
Battery platform / chemistry battery
Inverter OEM
Inverter / PCS model
Equipment confidence low
Stats window
07 Jun 2026 03:30 → 14 Jun 2026 03:30 AEST

Dispatch & revenue

07 Jun 2026 03:30 → 14 Jun 2026 03:30 AEST

No DUID specified. Open this page from the stats list or a generator profile.

Financial overview

2026 real AUD. Monetary values are CPI-adjusted to 2026 real Australian dollars. Greenfield capex uses AEMO benchmarks when plant-specific cost is unknown.
Type
Battery (BESS)
Capacity
200 MW
Revenue (× MLF) (stats)
See dispatch stats link above
Est. SRMC
$1.50/MWh
Capex total (greenfield)
Capex refurbishment
Capex / MWh storage
$369,198

Shown in table
$369.2k (2026 real AUD)

Reported / source value
$350.0k (2024 nominal)
Adjusted to 2026 real AUD using Australian CPI (All Groups).

Fixed OPEX (annual)
Fixed OPEX / MW-yr default
$25,000

Shown in table
$25.0k (2026 real AUD)

Variable OPEX / MWh default
$1.50

Shown in table
$1.50 (2026 real AUD)

Fuel cost / GJ
Heat rate GJ/MWh

Confidence: low · Status: ai estimated · Capex basis: default · AI checked 05 Jun 2026

Notes
No plant-specific greenfield capex announcement for Callide Energy Hub - KCI (200 MW battery) was found in the searched owner, government, or project pages. The available public source identified the site as a publicly announced 200 MW battery, but did not provide a total project cost. To avoid misattributing a broader precinct or unrelated project cost, capex remains unfilled. Operational/O&M assumptions were also not found specifically for this site. The project appears separate from CS Energy's Chinchilla and Greenbank battery projects, which have published costs but are not applicable to this DUID.

Sources